Your Paper, The Right Path. Every thing should really be made as easy as possible, yet not easier.

Your Paper, The Right Path. Every thing should really be made as easy as possible, yet not easier.

– Related To Albert Einstein

View

Prezi to find out more about Your Paper, the right path

A recurring plea from scientists is actually to simplify the entire process of planning and publishing documents. With every journal having various technical and formatting needs and several documents being submitted over and over again before book, writers believe it is onerous to own to invest time that is valuable as opposed to engaging using the more effective components of research. In reality, almost one out of three scientists suggested “preparing manuscripts” when asked what work activities they discovered most irritating or time-consuming, in a study completed by Elsevier’s analysis and Academic Relations department in 2012.

Aided by the goal of making the distribution process easier, the Elsevier log, complimentary revolutionary Biology and Medicine launched Your Paper, Your Way (YPYW) last year. YPYW is a simpler distribution procedure, emphasizing the grade of the technology within the initial phases of distribution and just elements that are requiring for ultimate production in the modification stage. If papers are refused, this easier distribution procedure saves authors commitment and in addition, can help them attain faster publication rates.

YPYW has been extended to hundreds of Elsevier journals. Every log that provides YPYW demonstrably suggests this at the start of its guide for authors, the following:

” We now differentiate between your demands for brand new and revised submissions. You may possibly decide to submit your manuscript being A word that is single or file to be utilized within the refereeing procedure. only once your paper has reached the modification phase, are you required to place your paper right into a ‘correct structure’ for acceptance and supply the things necessary for the book of one’s article.”

Your Paper, Your Path needs

  • Authors may submit their manuscript (text, numbers and tables) as a solitary file. This is often A term or PDF file, in virtually any structure or design, and numbers and tables may be placed inside the text.
  • Numbers is of high quality that is enough refereeing.
  • There are not any strict formatting needs but all manuscripts must support the crucial elements needed seriously to evaluate a manuscript (Abstract, keyword phrases, Introduction, components & techniques, outcomes, Conclusions, Artwork and Tables with Captions).
  • Sources may be in just about any style or format, as long since the style is consistent. Author(s) name(s), journal title/book name, article name (where needed), 12 months of publication, amount & problem /book chapter in addition to pagination needs to be current. Usage of DOI is very motivated. The guide design utilized by the log will be reproduced to your accepted article by Elsevier during the evidence stage.
  • Whenever the revision is reached by a paper phase, writers will soon be required to produce any things that continue to be necessary for book, as an example editable source files.

Reactions to YPYW

YPYW happens to be positively gotten by authors. In a study sent by Elsevier’s analysis and Academic Relations department to writers that has chosen YPYW whenever publishing their manuscript, for the 3,958 writers surveyed, 70% reacted absolutely when asked, “Did Your Paper, the right path lower the period of time it often takes to format and submit the manuscript?” Reviews received from surveyed writers included:

. time-consuming formatting work had been maybe perhaps perhaps not undertaken needlessly.

I did not need to spend time with formatting before being yes concerning the acceptance.

It had been easier and faster than [the] traditional one. I believe it really is a way that is good speed the procedure.

92% of writers surveyed found YPYW simple or acutely easy, in comparison to 61% of writers who utilized the old-fashioned procedure.

To judge the effect on reviewers, 870 reactions from Elsevier’s current Reviewer Feedback Programme (RFP) were analyzed, of which 346 essay-writing associated with a YPYW submission. There have been no differences that are significant reviewer satisfaction. Some reviewers have actually complimented the modification as it makes their everyday lives better to look at the numbers and tables inside the text, in the place of at the conclusion of this manuscript as it is typically needed.

Further reading

“Your Paper, Your Way”, Kelvin J A Davies, PhD, DSc, Editor-in-Chief, Complimentary Revolutionary Biology & Medicine

“Your Paper, your path plus the reviewing procedure”, Catriona Fennell, Rebecca Barrie